That is part 1 of a multipart number of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this informative article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it does, some factual statements about the existing state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.

The legislators want to protect us from something, or are they? The whole lot seems a little confusing to express the least.

The House, and the Senate, are once again considering the issue of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have now been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.

The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte gets the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all kinds of online gambling, to create it illegal for a gambling business to simply accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block access to gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.

Just as does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, helps it be illegal for gambling businesses to simply accept charge cards, electronic transfers, checks and other types of payment, but his bill does not address the keeping bets.

The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is simply a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It focuses on preventing gambling businesses from accepting charge cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes as to the is currently legal.

In accordance with Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling is currently illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It is common for illegal gambling businesses to work freely until police force finds and stops them.”

Actually, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Hardly any states have laws that make online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes took steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some kinds of online gambling to be legal.메이저사이트

Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all kinds of interstate gambling and account for new technologies. Under current federal law, it is unclear whether using the Internet to work a gambling business is illegal” ;.

Goodlatte’s bill however does not “cover all kinds of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for many kinds of online gambling such as state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act don’t make online gambling illegal, they ensure it is illegal for a gambling business to simply accept online bets in which a person risks something of value “upon the results of a contest of others, a sporting event, or a game predominantly subject to chance”, except obviously when it is circumstances lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or one of a few other situations.

The reality of the problem is that most online gambling businesses have situated in other countries specifically to avoid the gray area that’s the existing state of online gambling in the US. Consequently, there’s little that police force may do to enforce these laws. Trying to really make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, will not cause them to become better to enforce.

As well, most, if not totally all, banks and bank card companies will not transfer money to an on line gambling business now, consequently of pressure from the federal government. Consequently, alternative payment systems sprang around fill the void.

Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal use of payment system instruments, charge cards, and wire transfers.” But as we already know just, most charge cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.

Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is an increasing reason for debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the buyer credit industry.” If the bank card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S are not allowing the funding of gambling, how would it be “an increasing reason for debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we need legislation in order for the financial industry to guard itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were a problem for them, wouldn’t they just stop accepting them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *